New Rules for Sponsoring Parents and Grandparents for Permanent Residence in Canada
January 8, 2025Best Interest of a Child in Canadian Immigration Appeals
January 13, 2025
Cassandra Fultz, RCIC-IRB
Post-Resignation Impact on Bill C-71
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s recent resignation and the prorogation of Parliament have led to the termination of several legislative initiatives, most notably Bill C-71, which sought to amend the Citizenship Act regarding citizenship by descent.
Bill C-71 aimed to address the “second-generation cut-off” in the Citizenship Act, which prevents Canadian citizens born abroad from passing their Canadian citizenship to their foreign-born children. The bill proposed a pathway for such citizens to confer citizenship to their children. This amendment was introduced in response to a December 2023 ruling by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, which deemed the existing provisions unconstitutional.
With Parliament prorogued until March 24, 2025, all active bills, including Bill C-71, have been terminated. This means the federal government will not meet the court-mandated deadline to amend the Citizenship Act, leaving affected individuals in a state of limbo. While there remains hope that the legislation might be reintroduced, the possibility that it may not be extended at all raises serious concerns. Without a clear pathway forward, individuals impacted by the second-generation cut-off face prolonged uncertainty, with no immediate resolution in sight.
The prorogation not only stalls Bill C-71 but also delays other key immigration reforms and policies, compounding the uncertainty for prospective immigrants and those navigating Canada’s immigration system. The absence of legislative clarity is particularly troubling for families and individuals whose legal rights hinge on reforms now in jeopardy.
As the Liberal Party searches for new leadership and Parliament remains suspended, the future of these legislative initiatives hangs in the balance. Any incoming leadership will need to prioritize reintroducing and advancing such critical reforms to address the legal, social, and personal implications arising from these delays. However, the path forward remains unclear, and there is a real risk that these reforms may not materialize, leaving those affected in a precarious position.
Post-Resignation Impact on Bill C-71
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s recent resignation and the prorogation of Parliament have led to the termination of several legislative initiatives, most notably Bill C-71, which sought to amend the Citizenship Act regarding citizenship by descent.
Bill C-71 aimed to address the “second-generation cut-off” in the Citizenship Act, which prevents Canadian citizens born abroad from passing their Canadian citizenship to their foreign-born children. The bill proposed a pathway for such citizens to confer citizenship to their children. This amendment was introduced in response to a December 2023 ruling by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, which deemed the existing provisions unconstitutional.
With Parliament prorogued until March 24, 2025, all active bills, including Bill C-71, have been terminated. This means the federal government will not meet the court-mandated deadline to amend the Citizenship Act, leaving affected individuals in a state of limbo. While there remains hope that the legislation might be reintroduced, the possibility that it may not be extended at all raises serious concerns. Without a clear pathway forward, individuals impacted by the second-generation cut-off face prolonged uncertainty, with no immediate resolution in sight.
The prorogation not only stalls Bill C-71 but also delays other key immigration reforms and policies, compounding the uncertainty for prospective immigrants and those navigating Canada’s immigration system. The absence of legislative clarity is particularly troubling for families and individuals whose legal rights hinge on reforms now in jeopardy.
As the Liberal Party searches for new leadership and Parliament remains suspended, the future of these legislative initiatives hangs in the balance. Any incoming leadership will need to prioritize reintroducing and advancing such critical reforms to address the legal, social, and personal implications arising from these delays. However, the path forward remains unclear, and there is a real risk that these reforms may not materialize, leaving those affected in a precarious position.
